GPT-4o vs PaddleOCR: API vs Open Source
December 2025. Same invoice. Different approaches.
GPT-4o costs money but thinks. PaddleOCR is free but extracts. I tested both to find out when the thinking is worth paying for.
The Test
Same invoice, both systems, measured everything.
Test invoice. 800x600 pixels, white background, standard fonts.
The Results
| Metric | PaddleOCR | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Time | 4.85s | 7.58s |
| Confidence | 99.6% | N/A |
| Character errors | 0 | 0 |
| Table structure | Lost | Preserved |
| Cost per image | $0 | ~$0.01 |
| Tokens used | N/A | 943 |
The Key Difference: Structure
Both got every character right. Zero errors. The difference is what they did with the table.
PaddleOCR Output
INVOICE
Invoice #: INV-2025-001
Date: December 16, 2025
Bill To:
John Smith
123 Main Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Description
Qty
Price
Total
Web Development Services
40
$150.00
$6,000.00
... "Description", "Qty", "Price", "Total" are separate lines. The table became a list of words. If you want to know that "Web Development Services" costs "$150.00", you need to write code to reconstruct that relationship.
GPT-4o Output
INVOICE
Invoice #: INV-2025-001
Date: December 16, 2025
Bill To:
John Smith
123 Main Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
Description Qty Price Total
Web Development Services 40 $150.00 $6,000.00
UI/UX Design 20 $125.00 $2,500.00
Server Hosting (Annual) 1 $480.00 $480.00
Subtotal: $8,980.00
Tax (8.5%): $763.30
Total: $9,743.30 The table headers align with values. You can see that "Web Development Services" has Qty 40, Price $150.00, Total $6,000.00. GPT-4o understood the document.
When to Pay for GPT-4o
GPT-4o wins when you need to understand documents, not just extract text:
- Tables with complex layouts
- Documents where you want to ask questions ("What's the total?")
- Mixed content with forms, tables, and text
- Small batches where $0.01/image is irrelevant
When PaddleOCR is Better
PaddleOCR wins when you're processing at scale and can write your own parsing logic:
- 100,000 documents = $1,000 with GPT-4o, $0 with PaddleOCR
- Privacy-sensitive documents that can't leave your server
- Consistent document formats where you can write regex
- Batch processing where speed matters more than structure
The Code
PaddleOCR
from paddleocr import PaddleOCR
ocr = PaddleOCR(lang='en')
result = ocr.predict('invoice.png')
for item in result:
for text in item.get('rec_texts', []):
print(text) GPT-4o
import base64
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
with open('invoice.png', 'rb') as f:
img = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="gpt-4o",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": [
{"type": "text", "text": "Extract all text from this image."},
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": f"data:image/png;base64,{img}"}}
]}]
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content) The Hybrid Approach
For production systems, consider both:
- Use PaddleOCR for bulk processing (cheap, fast)
- Send complex or failed documents to GPT-4o (accurate, understands structure)
- Extract with PaddleOCR, then ask GPT-4o questions about the text
This gives you 99% of documents at $0/each and 1% at $0.01/each.
My Recommendation
Use PaddleOCR when: High volume. Budget matters. Consistent document formats. Privacy requirements.
Use GPT-4o when: Complex layouts. Tables. Document Q&A. Small batches. Structure matters.
Start with PaddleOCR. It's free and handles most cases. When you hit documents it struggles with - complex tables, mixed layouts - send those to GPT-4o.