Quick Answer: NLP in 2025

LLMs dominate, but specialized models still win on speed and cost.

Best general LLM:
GPT-4o (balanced) / Claude 3.5 Opus (reasoning) / o1 (math)
Best open-source LLM:
Llama 3.1 405B (best) / Qwen 2.5 72B (efficient)
Best embeddings:
Voyage AI voyage-3 (API) / BGE-M3 (open source)
Best for classification/NER:
Fine-tuned DeBERTa (speed) / LLM few-shot (flexibility)
Best for translation:
GPT-4o (quality) / NLLB-200 (200 languages, free)
The tradeoff:
LLMs: flexible, slow, expensive. Specialized: fast, cheap, rigid.

NLP Benchmarks 2025

From academic benchmarks to production pipelines. Every NLP task maps to a building block with code you can deploy today.

Updated December 2025|15 min read

LLM Comparison

Current frontier models ranked by reasoning benchmarks. Costs are per million input tokens.

ModelMMLUHumanEvalReasoningSpeedCostBest For
GPT-4oOpenAI88.7%90.2%ExcellentFast$2.50/1M inGeneral-purpose, multimodal
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic88.3%92%ExcellentFast$3/1M inCoding, long context, safety
Claude 3.5 OpusAnthropic89.1%89.5%BestMedium$15/1M inComplex reasoning, analysis
Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle85.9%84.1%Very GoodFast$1.25/1M in1M+ context, multimodal
Llama 3.1 405BMeta (Open)88.6%89%ExcellentVariableSelf-hostOpen source, customization
Qwen 2.5 72BAlibaba (Open)86.1%86.4%Very GoodVariableSelf-hostMultilingual, open source
GPT-4o-miniOpenAI82%87.2%GoodVery Fast$0.15/1M inCost-efficient, high volume
Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropic80.5%84%GoodVery Fast$0.25/1M inFast responses, cost-efficient
Best Overall
GPT-4o / Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Best balance of quality, speed, and cost
Best Value
GPT-4o-mini / Claude Haiku
90% of quality at 10% of cost
Best Open Source
Llama 3.1 405B
GPT-4 class, fully open weights

LLM vs Specialized Model: Decision Guide

Use LLMs when:
  • +Few examples available (few-shot learning)
  • +Complex, nuanced task definitions
  • +Need to explain reasoning
  • +Task evolves frequently
  • +Low volume (<10K requests/day)
Use Specialized Models when:
  • +High volume (>100K requests/day)
  • +Latency critical (<100ms)
  • +Cost sensitive (pennies per 1K)
  • +Well-defined, stable task
  • +Training data available

Have benchmark results to share?

We track the latest NLP advances. Submit new SOTA results or suggest benchmarks.