ABIDE I

Unknown

1,112 resting-state fMRI datasets from 539 individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 573 typically developing controls across 17 international sites. Multi-site neuroimaging data for autism classification and biomarker discovery.

Benchmark Stats

Models17
Papers21
Metrics2

SOTA History

Not enough data to show trend.

accuracy

accuracy

Higher is better

RankModelSourceScoreYearPaper
1plymouth-dl-model

98% on 884 participant subset. Highlights visual cortex regions.

Editorial982025Source
2mcbert

Multi-modal CNN-BERT with leave-one-site-out cross-validation. Combines brain MRI and meta-features.

Editorial93.42025Source
3ae-fcn

Autoencoder + FCN combining fMRI and sMRI data (Rakic et al., 2020).

Editorial852025Source
4multi-atlas-dnn

Multi-atlas deep neural network with hinge loss. 79.13% on augmented data.

Editorial78.072025Source
5asd-swnet

Shared-weight feature extraction network. Precision: 76.15%, Recall: 80.65%.

Editorial76.522025Source
6maacnn

Multi-attention CNN. AUC: 0.79 on ABIDE-I.

Editorial75.122025Source
7al-negat

Adversarial learning-based node-edge graph attention network. 1,007 subjects across 17 sites.

Editorial74.72025Source
8braingnn

ROI-aware graph convolutional network. Interpretable biomarker discovery. 1,035 subjects.

Editorial73.32025Source
9gcn

Graph Convolutional Network combining fMRI and sMRI with max voting.

Editorial72.22025Source
10multi-task-transformer

Multi-task transformer neural network on UM dataset. Attention mechanism for feature extraction.

Editorial722025Source
11phgcl-ddgformer

Graph contrastive learning with graph transformer. 74.8% sensitivity.

Editorial70.92025Source
12svm-connectivity

Support Vector Machine with functional connectivity features. Classic baseline comparison.

Editorial70.12025Source
13deep-learning-heinsfeld

Deep learning approach by Heinsfeld et al. (2017). Anterior-posterior brain connectivity disruption.

Editorial702025Source
14mvs-gcn

Multi-view Site Graph Convolutional Network handling multi-site variability.

Editorial69.382025Source
15abraham-connectomes

Participant-specific functional connectivity matrices (Abraham et al., 2017).

Editorial672025Source
16random-forest

Random Forest baseline. Sensitivity: 69%, Specificity: 58%.

Editorial632025Source

auc

auc

Higher is better

RankModelSourceScoreYearPaper
1asd-swnet

AUC-ROC score for autism vs typical control classification.

Editorial812025Source
2braingт

Graph Transformer for brain disorder diagnosis. Significantly outperforms BrainNetTF (73.2%).

Editorial78.72025Source
3gcn

Best performing model in comprehensive comparison study (2024).

Editorial782025Source
4svm-connectivity

Traditional ML baseline with functional connectivity matrices.

Editorial772025Source
5mvs-gcn

Multi-view approach addressing site heterogeneity.

Editorial69.012025Source

Submit a Result