ABIDE I

Unknown

1,112 resting-state fMRI datasets from 539 individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 573 typically developing controls across 17 international sites. Multi-site neuroimaging data for autism classification and biomarker discovery.

Benchmark Stats

Models17
Papers21
Metrics2

SOTA History

Coming Soon
Visual timeline of state-of-the-art progression over time will appear here.

accuracy

accuracy

Higher is better

RankModelCodeScorePaper / Source
1plymouth-dl-model

98% on 884 participant subset. Highlights visual cortex regions.

-98research-paper
2mcbert

Multi-modal CNN-BERT with leave-one-site-out cross-validation. Combines brain MRI and meta-features.

-93.4research-paper
3ae-fcn

Autoencoder + FCN combining fMRI and sMRI data (Rakic et al., 2020).

-85research-paper
4multi-atlas-dnn

Multi-atlas deep neural network with hinge loss. 79.13% on augmented data.

-78.07research-paper
5asd-swnet

Shared-weight feature extraction network. Precision: 76.15%, Recall: 80.65%.

-76.52research-paper
6maacnn

Multi-attention CNN. AUC: 0.79 on ABIDE-I.

-75.12research-paper
7al-negat

Adversarial learning-based node-edge graph attention network. 1,007 subjects across 17 sites.

-74.7research-paper
8braingnn

ROI-aware graph convolutional network. Interpretable biomarker discovery. 1,035 subjects.

73.3research-paper
9gcn

Graph Convolutional Network combining fMRI and sMRI with max voting.

-72.2research-paper
10multi-task-transformer

Multi-task transformer neural network on UM dataset. Attention mechanism for feature extraction.

-72research-paper
11phgcl-ddgformer

Graph contrastive learning with graph transformer. 74.8% sensitivity.

-70.9research-paper
12svm-connectivity

Support Vector Machine with functional connectivity features. Classic baseline comparison.

-70.1research-paper
13deep-learning-heinsfeld

Deep learning approach by Heinsfeld et al. (2017). Anterior-posterior brain connectivity disruption.

-70research-paper
14mvs-gcn

Multi-view Site Graph Convolutional Network handling multi-site variability.

-69.38research-paper
15abraham-connectomes

Participant-specific functional connectivity matrices (Abraham et al., 2017).

-67research-paper
16random-forest

Random Forest baseline. Sensitivity: 69%, Specificity: 58%.

-63research-paper

auc

auc

Higher is better

RankModelCodeScorePaper / Source
1asd-swnet

AUC-ROC score for autism vs typical control classification.

-81research-paper
2braingт

Graph Transformer for brain disorder diagnosis. Significantly outperforms BrainNetTF (73.2%).

-78.7research-paper
3gcn

Best performing model in comprehensive comparison study (2024).

-78research-paper
4svm-connectivity

Traditional ML baseline with functional connectivity matrices.

-77research-paper
5mvs-gcn

Multi-view approach addressing site heterogeneity.

-69.01research-paper