Codesota · Papers · Agentic AI2026-05-04
Paper

AcademiClaw: When Students Set Challenges for AI Agents

Junjie Yu, Pengrui Lu, Weiye Si, Hongliang Lu, Jiabao Wu, Kaiwen Tao, Kun Wang, Lingyu Yang et al.
arXiv ↗Paper ↗Code ↗

Benchmarks within the OpenClaw ecosystem have thus far evaluated exclusively assistant-level tasks, leaving the academic-level capabilities of OpenClaw largely unexamined. We introduce AcademiClaw, a bilingual benchmark of 80 complex, long-horizon tasks sourced directly from university students' real academic workflows -- homework, research projects, competitions, and personal projects -- that they found current AI agents unable to solve effectively.

Curated from 230 student-submitted candidates through rigorous expert review, the final task set spans 25+ professional domains, ranging from olympiad-level mathematics and linguistics problems to GPU-intensive reinforcement learning and full-stack system debugging, with 16 tasks requiring CUDA GPU execution. Each task executes in an isolated Docker sandbox and is scored on task completion by multi-dimensional rubrics combining six complementary techniques, with an independent five-category safety audit providing additional behavioral analysis.

Experiments on six frontier models show that even the best achieves only a 55\% pass rate. Further analysis uncovers sharp capability boundaries across task domains, divergent behavioral strategies among models, and a disconnect between token consumption and output quality, providing fine-grained diagnostic signals beyond what aggregate metrics reveal.

We hope that AcademiClaw and its open-sourced data and code can serve as a useful resource for the OpenClaw community, driving progress toward agents that are more capable and versatile across the full breadth of real-world academic demands. All data and code are available at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/AcademiClaw.

§ 01 · Benchmark results

35 results reproduced from this paper.

View:
Sorted instantly in-page
Results
6
SOTA rows
1
Models
6
Datasets
1
#ModelVendorBenchmarkValueSOTADateSource
01Claude Opus 4.6AnthropicAcademiClaw71.9%#12026-05-04source ↗
02Claude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicAcademiClaw68.3%2026-05-04source ↗
03GPT-5.4OpenAIAcademiClaw65.6%2026-05-04source ↗
04Qwen3.5-397B-A17B†AlibabaAcademiClaw64.7%2026-05-04source ↗
05Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleAcademiClaw64.3%2026-05-04source ↗
06MiniMax M2.7MiniMaxAcademiClaw63.1%2026-05-04source ↗
Benchmark trail
§ 02 · Models

6 models from this paper.

introduces
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
introduces
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
introduces
GPT-5.4
OpenAI
introduces
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
introduces
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax
introduces
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B†
Alibaba
§ 03 · Datasets

1 dataset from this paper.

uses · Agentic AI
AcademiClaw
Task agents
Read next

Three places to go from here.

Index
All papers
All tracked papers in the registry, with benchmark result, model, and leaderboard linkage where available.
Replacement
Papers with Code is dead — alternatives
What replaced PWC for each use case: LLMs, OCR, speech, vision, robotics.
Top hub
Agentic AI
Every benchmark in Agentic AI.